Your Spring Boot application has complex business logic that involves interactions between various beans. How would you approach testing such business logic, ensuring that the interactions between beans are correct and that the business logic produces the expected outcomes?
- Use unit tests to verify the behavior of individual beans and integration tests to verify interactions between beans
- Skip testing the interactions between beans
- Test only the final outcome of the business logic
- Use manual testing for bean interactions
To ensure the correctness of interactions between beans and the expected outcomes of complex business logic, you should use unit tests to verify the behavior of individual beans and integration tests to verify interactions between beans. This approach allows you to isolate and test individual components as well as their interactions. Skipping interactions or testing only the final outcome is not sufficient for comprehensive testing. Manual testing for bean interactions is not a scalable or reliable approach for complex applications.
Which of the following annotations is used to mark a class as a source of bean definitions?
- @Configuration
- @Entity
- @Repository
- @Service
The @Configuration annotation is used to mark a class as a source of bean definitions. This means that any method annotated with @Bean within a class annotated with @Configuration will define a bean in the Spring context, allowing it to be injected into other components, services, etc. This is fundamental for creating the beans that make up the application context in a Spring application.
Imagine you have a Spring Boot application with complex security configurations. How would you perform integration tests to ensure that all security constraints and access controls are working as expected?
- Disable security during testing.
- Use hardcoded credentials for testing.
- Leverage Spring Security Test to simulate authenticated users and roles.
- Perform manual security testing after development.
Option 3 is the best approach. Spring Security Test provides utilities for simulating authenticated users and roles, allowing you to test security constraints and access controls effectively.
In which scenario would you choose WebFlux over the traditional blocking architecture in Spring Boot?
- When synchronous processing is sufficient.
- When the application has a low volume of incoming requests.
- When the application is not using Spring Boot.
- When the application requires high concurrency and responsiveness.
WebFlux is a good choice when you need to handle a large number of concurrent connections with high responsiveness. It excels in scenarios where non-blocking, asynchronous processing is crucial to avoid thread blocking and efficiently utilize system resources. In contrast, the traditional blocking architecture is suitable for applications with lower concurrency and when synchronous processing is sufficient.
The _____ annotation in JUnit is used to indicate that a method should be executed after all tests in the current test class have been run.
- @After
- @AfterAll
- @AfterClass
- @BeforeClass
In JUnit, the @AfterClass annotation is used to indicate that a method should be executed after all tests in the current test class have been run. This is often used for cleanup tasks after running a suite of tests.
When using the @WebMvcTest annotation in Spring Boot, only the _____ are typically loaded into the application context.
- configuration files
- controllers and related components
- entire application context
- service and repository beans
With @WebMvcTest, only the controllers and related components are typically loaded into the application context. This is useful for testing the web layer of your application in isolation without loading the entire context.
In Spring Boot, the _____ annotation can be used to specify the conditions or actions that should be executed before testing each method.
- @Before
- @BeforeAll
- @BeforeEach
- @BeforeMethod
In Spring Boot, you can use the @BeforeEach annotation to specify actions that should be executed before testing each method. This is often used for setup actions before individual test cases.
For integration testing in Spring Boot, the _____ annotation is used to specify that only certain parts or layers of the application should be loaded.
- @ContextConfiguration
- @IntegrationTest
- @SpringBootTest
- @WebMvcTest
In Spring Boot, to load only the web layer of an application during integration tests, you can use the @WebMvcTest annotation. It narrows down the scope of the context loaded for testing to just the web-related components.
In Spring Boot, which annotation is used to handle exceptions at the controller level?
- @ExceptionHandler
- @ControllerAdvice
- @RestController
- @RequestMapping
In Spring Boot, the @ExceptionHandler annotation is used to handle exceptions at the controller level. This annotation allows you to define methods within a controller that can handle specific exceptions thrown by that controller. The other options, such as @ControllerAdvice, @RestController, and @RequestMapping, have different roles and are not used for handling exceptions directly at the controller level.
In a Spring Boot test, how can you override the properties defined in the application.properties file?
- Create a new application-test.properties file.
- Use @TestPropertySource annotation to load custom properties.
- Modify application.properties directly in the test code.
- Properties cannot be overridden in Spring Boot tests.
In Spring Boot tests, you can override properties defined in application.properties by using the @TestPropertySource annotation to load custom properties. Option (1) is incorrect as it's not a standard practice. Option (3) is incorrect because modifying application.properties directly in test code is not recommended. Option (4) is incorrect; properties can be overridden.