How does user interface testing differ in web applications compared to mobile applications?
- It doesn't differ at all
- Mobile apps are tested on browsers only
- Mobile apps need more gestures for testing
- Web apps need responsive testing
User interface testing verifies that the interface elements of an application are functioning correctly. When comparing web to mobile applications, one significant difference is the type and variety of user gestures. Mobile apps often require testing for gestures like swiping, pinching, long-presses, etc. Web applications, especially responsive ones, might need testing across different viewport sizes, but the variety of gestures is typically less complex than on mobile. Moreover, mobile app testing may also involve device and OS-specific checks.
How does the principle "Early Testing" influence the Software Development Life Cycle?
- It delays the testing phase
- It emphasizes testing only after deployment
- It emphasizes testing right before deployment
- It stresses on testing from the early stages of the lifecycle
The principle of "Early Testing" emphasizes initiating testing activities as early as the requirements gathering phase. This proactive approach allows teams to identify and rectify defects at an earlier stage, making the defect management process less cumbersome and cost-effective. Early testing ensures quality is integrated throughout the lifecycle, reducing the overall risk and potential rework in later stages.
_______ testing ensures that integrated components of an application function as expected when the system interacts with external interfaces.
- Interface
- Load
- Performance
- Security
Interface testing is specifically designed to ensure that the interaction between different software applications occurs smoothly. It verifies that communication processes are functioning as expected when the software system interfaces with other software systems or hardware components. Performance and load testing focus on system's performance metrics, while security testing checks vulnerabilities.
Why is keyboard navigation an essential aspect of accessibility testing?
- It allows users to change website fonts.
- It ensures a better graphical interface.
- It ensures that web content is accessible even without a mouse.
- It helps in faster page loading.
Keyboard navigation is a fundamental aspect of accessibility testing because many users, especially those with motor disabilities, might not be able to use a mouse or touch screen effectively. Ensuring that all functionalities of a web application are accessible via keyboard ensures that the app or website is usable by a wider range of users, thereby enhancing its overall accessibility.
Your team follows Agile methodology with continuous integration and frequent deployments. Which tool, integrated with CI/CD pipelines, will ensure that automated tests run with each build and deployment?
- ALM
- JIRA
- Jenkins
- TestNG
Jenkins is a widely-used Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment tool that facilitates the automation of parts of the development process. By integrating Jenkins with a project's CI/CD pipeline, teams can ensure that automated tests are executed with every build, promoting a robust testing culture in Agile environments.
How does the "Focus Indicator" help in enhancing the accessibility of web applications?
- By changing the color theme of the website.
- By highlighting errors on the page.
- By indicating the user's current position on a webpage.
- By showing animations on clickable items.
A "Focus Indicator" is crucial for keyboard navigation, as it visually signifies the current position or element that has focus on a webpage. This is particularly essential for those who rely on the keyboard to navigate, such as individuals with motor disabilities. Without a clear indicator, it would be challenging to understand which part of the webpage is currently active or in focus.
In a situation where the development team wants to integrate and test the functionality of two units that communicate with each other but one unit is not yet fully developed, what approach might be beneficial?
- Bottom-Up Integration
- Sandwich Integration
- Stubs and Drivers
- Top-Down Integration
When one of the interacting units isn't fully developed, "Stubs and Drivers" can be employed. A "Stub" is a simplistic implementation of the missing unit, while a "Driver" simulates a unit that calls the incomplete one. These temporary components allow early testing of interactions between units, without waiting for full development.
Why is exploratory testing often combined with other structured testing techniques in a testing cycle?
- For better test coverage
- To find more defects
- To make testing more exciting
- To reduce testing time
Exploratory testing, being less structured, allows testers to rapidly identify and react to software behavior. When combined with structured testing, it ensures that not only are predetermined test cases being executed, but the tester's experience, intuition, and creativity also come into play to provide a more comprehensive test coverage. This synergistic combination often results in discovering defects that might have been overlooked with only a structured approach.
Which of the following is NOT typically a part of the review process?
- Code execution
- Gathering feedback
- Identifying discrepancies
- Inspecting the product
Code execution is a dynamic activity where the software is run to check its behavior, whereas reviews are a static technique. Reviews focus on inspecting the product, gathering feedback, and identifying discrepancies without actually running the software.
The process of setting up, writing, and maintaining automated tests often requires a(n) _______ investment upfront.
- adaptive
- instantaneous
- minimal
- substantial
Setting up automated tests requires a significant initial investment in terms of time, effort, and resources. This includes selecting the right tools, writing the scripts, and maintaining them to adapt to changes in the application being tested.