When a child component is rendered using a Portal, it still inherits the ________ from its parent component.
- Context
- Props
- State
- Styles
When a child component is rendered using a Portal, it still inherits the Props from its parent component. This allows data to be passed from the parent to the child component even when the child is rendered in a different part of the DOM. While state, styles, and context are important in React, they are not inherited by default when using Portals.
A component needs to fetch data from an API only once when it's first rendered. Which hook/method can be used to achieve this in a functional component?
- componentDidMount()
- componentWillMount()
- useEffect() with an empty dependency array
- useFetchEffect()
To fetch data from an API only once when a functional component is first rendered, you should use the useEffect() hook with an empty dependency array []. This ensures that the effect runs only once, mimicking the behavior of componentDidMount() in class components.
You're building a React application that performs heavy data processing on large datasets. To ensure the UI remains responsive during this processing, which technique should you implement?
- Implementing a single-threaded approach.
- Increasing the UI thread's priority.
- Using asynchronous JavaScript functions (async/await).
- Utilizing Web Workers.
To ensure a responsive UI during heavy data processing, utilizing Web Workers is the recommended approach. Web Workers allow for concurrent execution in the background, preventing the main UI thread from being blocked. Asynchronous JavaScript functions (async/await) are useful but may not fully address UI responsiveness during heavy computations. A single-threaded approach can lead to UI blocking, and increasing the UI thread's priority may not solve the root problem.
In the context of a React application with many components interested in real-time updates, how would you efficiently distribute Websocket messages to relevant components?
- Use a global state management library like Redux or React Context to store and distribute messages.
- Broadcast messages to all components and let them filter the relevant ones.
- Pass messages directly from parent to child components using props.
- Store messages in local component state and handle distribution in each component individually.
To efficiently distribute Websocket messages to relevant components in a React application, it's best to use a global state management library like Redux or React Context (Option 1). This allows you to centralize message handling and ensure that the relevant components receive updates without unnecessary rerendering. The other options are less efficient and may lead to suboptimal performance.
Which pattern in React allows for sharing logic between components without adding component wrappers?
- Component Composition Pattern
- Higher Order Components (HOC)
- Prop Drilling Pattern
- Render Props Pattern
The Render Props Pattern in React allows for sharing logic between components without adding component wrappers. It involves passing a function as a prop to a component, allowing that component to render something based on the logic provided by the function. This pattern promotes code reuse without the need for additional component layers.
For a real-time chat application in React, what pattern can be employed to efficiently manage and display incoming messages?
- Polling
- WebSockets
- Long Polling
- Server-Sent Events (SSE)
To efficiently manage and display incoming messages in a real-time chat application in React, you should employ the WebSockets pattern. WebSockets allow bidirectional communication, enabling the server to push new messages to the client in real-time without the need for constant polling or long polling. While other options like polling and server-sent events are possible, WebSockets are the most efficient choice for real-time applications.
Why might larger applications with a diverse team of developers prefer Redux over the Context API for state management?
- Redux provides a clear structure and guidelines for managing state.
- Redux has better performance with small applications.
- Redux simplifies component communication in a complex app.
- Redux has a smaller learning curve for new developers.
Larger applications with diverse teams often prefer Redux over the Context API because Redux provides a clear structure and guidelines for managing state. This structure helps maintain code quality and consistency across a large codebase, making it easier for team members to collaborate effectively. While the other options may have their merits, they do not address the primary reason for choosing Redux in this context.
When React encounters two elements of different types during the reconciliation process, it will ________ the old tree and build a new one from scratch.
- Append to the existing tree
- Ignore the elements and continue
- Unmount and replace
- Update the old tree
When React encounters two elements of different types during the reconciliation process, it will "Unmount and replace" the old tree and build a new one from scratch. This approach ensures that the new elements are created and inserted correctly in the virtual DOM and the actual DOM, maintaining consistency in the UI.
When a component's output is not affected by a change in state or props, you can optimize its rendering with ______.
- Pure Components
- React.memo()
- useCallback()
- PureComponent()
When a component's output is not affected by a change in state or props, you can optimize its rendering with React.memo(). This higher-order component (HOC) prevents unnecessary re-renders of a component when its input props remain the same. The other options are related to optimization but not specifically for cases where props or state don't change.
In a scenario where you have frequent state updates in different parts of your app, which state management approach might be more performant than Redux?
- Angular's built-in state management
- Local component state
- MobX
- jQuery
In scenarios with frequent state updates, MobX is often considered more performant than Redux. MobX utilizes observables and reacts to changes at a granular level, which can lead to better performance in situations with high-frequency state updates. In contrast, Redux follows a unidirectional data flow, which can be less efficient in such cases.