A team is facing challenges with the application becoming slow as it grows. They are considering using ChangeDetectionStrategy.OnPush for all components. What considerations should they keep in mind?
- Components may need manual triggering of change detection
- Event bindings will become more efficient
- It will automatically improve performance
- No need to consider immutability
When using ChangeDetectionStrategy.OnPush, components may need manual triggering of change detection through the ChangeDetectorRef service. This strategy doesn't automatically improve performance; it relies on developers to be mindful of when to trigger updates.
What would be a possible reason to detach a form control from its parent form group?
- To hide the control from the user interface.
- To improve security.
- To isolate its validation logic from the parent group.
- To reduce memory usage.
Detaching a form control from its parent form group is done to isolate its validation logic from the parent group. This can be useful when you want to reuse a control's validation logic in multiple places or when the control should have its separate set of validation rules that aren't tied to the parent group's validation logic. It's not typically done for security, memory usage, or user interface hiding purposes.
Imagine you're building a custom tooltip directive in Angular. To ensure that the tooltip is positioned relative to the element it's attached to, you need to gain access to the host element. How would you achieve this?
- ElementRef and Renderer2
- Renderer2 and @ViewChild
- ViewChild and ElementRef
- ViewChild and Renderer2
To gain access to the host element when building a custom directive, you would typically use ElementRef and Renderer2. ElementRef allows you to access the host element directly, while Renderer2 provides a safe way to interact with the DOM. Using ViewChild can give you access to child components, not the host element. The combination of Renderer2 and ViewChild is not a common approach for this scenario.
In the context of Reactive Forms, which property indicates the current value of the FormControl, FormGroup, or FormArray instance?
- currentValue
- formData
- formValue
- valueChanges
In Angular Reactive Forms, the valueChanges property indicates the current value of the FormControl, FormGroup, or FormArray instance. This property allows you to subscribe to changes in the form control's value and react accordingly when the user interacts with the form elements. It's a crucial property for handling form data.
What happens if two services provided in different modules depend on each other?
- It creates a circular dependency and leads to a runtime error.
- It creates a linear dependency and improves application stability.
- It doesn't affect the application in any way.
- The services can't depend on each other; it's not allowed.
When two services provided in different modules depend on each other, it creates a circular dependency, which typically leads to a runtime error. Circular dependencies should be avoided in Angular (or similar frameworks) as they can cause issues during application initialization. It's essential to design the module structure carefully to prevent such dependencies.
When creating a shared service that should retain state and be available for all components, the service should be provided in _____.
- app.module.ts (root module)
- providers array of each component
- providers array of each component and the root module
- services.ts (custom service file)
When creating a shared service in Angular that should retain state and be available for all components, the service should be provided in the app.module.ts (root module). Providing the service in the root module's providers array ensures that a single instance of the service is created and shared across all components of the application. This makes it a suitable choice for managing global state or shared functionality.
When integrating a third-party input library with Angular forms, it's often necessary to implement a custom ________ to ensure compatibility.
- ControlValueAccessor
- FormControl
- FormDirective
- InputAdapter
When integrating third-party input libraries with Angular forms, you often need to implement a custom ControlValueAccessor. This custom implementation ensures that the library's input component can work seamlessly with Angular's form control infrastructure, allowing for proper value synchronization.
How can you provide a custom Value Accessor for a form control in Angular?
- By implementing the ControlValueAccessor interface and its methods.
- By creating a separate Angular module for custom Value Accessors.
- By using the "@ValueAccessor" decorator in the component.
- By extending the Angular FormControl class with custom logic.
To provide a custom Value Accessor for a form control in Angular, you should implement the ControlValueAccessor interface and its methods within the component. This interface defines methods for reading and writing values, making your custom control compatible with Angular forms. The other options do not align with the recommended approach.
The class that represents a group of FormControl instances in reactive forms is ______.
- ControlGroup
- FormArray
- FormControlGroup
- FormGroup
The class that represents a group of FormControl instances in reactive forms is FormGroup. FormGroup is used to create a container for multiple FormControl instances, allowing you to organize and validate related form controls as a group. It's a fundamental concept in Angular's reactive forms.
You are working on a large enterprise application where state management becomes essential. Which library would you consider integrating with Angular for this purpose?
- Bootstrap
- Lodash
- Redux
- jQuery
In Angular applications, for effective state management in a large enterprise application, Redux is a popular choice. Redux provides a predictable state container, making it easier to manage and share state across components. jQuery, Bootstrap, and Lodash are not primarily used for state management in Angular applications.