You’re maintaining a legacy C++ codebase which has limited comments and documentation. You encounter an erratic bug that only appears in the optimized build. What strategy might be most effective in isolating and fixing the bug?
- Add extensive documentation first
- Compare optimized and unoptimized assembly
- Refactor the entire codebase
- Use printf debugging
Comparing the optimized and unoptimized assembly can provide insights into how the compiler is altering the code, potentially revealing the source of the erratic behavior. It's a meticulous process but can be effective for bugs that only manifest in optimized builds due to compiler transformations.
Loading...
Related Quiz
- A C++ application is experiencing crashes due to memory corruption. During debugging, you notice that a function modifies the memory location of a pointer passed to it, affecting other parts of the application. Which concept might help prevent this issue in future implementations?
- What is the primary advantage of passing parameters by reference over passing them by value?
- When dealing with binary files, the ios::binary mode should be used in conjunction with another mode such as _______.
- If you want to force floating-point division in C++ when dividing two integers, one of the numbers should be _______.
- Imagine you're refactoring a legacy C++ codebase. It heavily uses friend functions, leading to a maintenance burden and difficult-to-follow code. What strategy might you adopt to improve encapsulation and maintainability without sacrificing performance?