What is the potential risk of using exception specifications like throw(type)?
- It can lead to unpredictable behavior
- It improves program efficiency
- It catches all types of exceptions
- It ensures type safety in exceptions
Using exception specifications like throw(type) can lead to unpredictable behavior if a different type of exception is thrown. In C++11 and later, these exception specifications are deprecated in favor of noexcept. If a function with a dynamic exception specification throws an exception not listed, it will call std::unexpected().
Loading...
Related Quiz
- The _______ keyword is used when we want to explicitly pass by reference but prevent the function from modifying the argument.
- The result of the expression (true || _______) in C++ will always be true.
- In a complex software project where multiple classes are interacting with one another, you discover that there is a significant performance bottleneck during the creation and deletion of objects, which is causing inefficiency. What strategy or principle might be applied to manage object creation and deletion more efficiently?
- How does the logical AND (&&) operator behave when the first operand is false?
- How does the performance of a switch-case statement compare to if-else if-else chains, especially when dealing with a large number of conditions?