When a merge conflict occurs, what does Git use to mark the conflicted area in the files?
- <<<<<<< HEAD, =======, >>>>>>> branch_name
- <<<<<<< conflict_start, =======, >>>>>>> conflict_end
- <<<<<<<, =======, >>>>>>>
- <<<<<<< HEAD, conflict_marker, >>>>>>>
When a merge conflict occurs, Git uses the conflict markers <<<<<<< HEAD, =======, and >>>>>>> branch_name to indicate the conflicting changes between the current branch (HEAD) and the branch being merged. Developers need to manually resolve these conflicts by editing the file to remove the markers and choose which changes to keep. The HEAD marker denotes the changes from the current branch, and the branch_name marker indicates the changes from the other branch.
Loading...
Related Quiz
- Which Git hook would you use to run scripts before a commit is finalized?
- A developer frequently uses long and complex Git commands. Which feature of Git can they use to create shortcuts for these commands?
- A company is transitioning from SVN to Git. They want to ensure their historical branches and tags are preserved. What migration strategy should they use?
- In the context of Git, what does the term 'merge conflict' specifically refer to?
- A project requires frequent updates to large media files. What strategy should be adopted in Git to manage these files efficiently without affecting the repository's performance?