How does the concept of 'rebase' play a role in resolving merge conflicts in a feature branching workflow?
- It avoids merge conflicts altogether
- It intensifies merge conflicts
- It has no impact on merge conflicts
- It delays the resolution of merge conflicts
The concept of 'rebase' in a feature branching workflow plays a role in resolving merge conflicts by avoiding them altogether. When you rebase a feature branch onto the target branch, it incorporates the changes from the target branch, making it easier to resolve conflicts locally before integration. This results in a cleaner project history and smoother integration process.
Loading...
Related Quiz
- How does GitHub Actions integrate with Git workflows for CI/CD?
- What are the implications of adopting a Git workflow in a distributed team with respect to continuous integration?
- A developer is working on a feature that is based on an outdated main branch. What strategy should they use to update their branch with the latest changes from the main branch?
- What is a common strategy for managing releases in the Gitflow model?
- When transitioning to Git, what strategy helps in preserving the history of a legacy codebase?