Scenario: You are working on an Agile project using JIRA, and you have a feature that requires multiple tasks to complete. How would you structure these tasks using different issue types in JIRA, and what benefits does this approach offer?

  • Bug for tasks related to the feature: This approach ensures that all tasks are treated as defects or issues.
  • Epic for overarching feature, Story for high-level user requirements, and Sub-tasks for specific implementation tasks: This approach allows for clear organization and tracking of tasks at different levels of granularity.
  • Sub-tasks for all tasks related to the feature: This approach simplifies tracking by using a single issue type for all tasks.
  • Task for all tasks related to the feature: This approach simplifies tracking by using a single issue type for all tasks.
Structuring tasks using different issue types in JIRA offers several benefits. By using an "Epic" for the overarching feature, "Story" for high-level user requirements, and "Sub-tasks" for specific implementation tasks, you can achieve clear organization and tracking at different levels of granularity. This approach allows for better visibility into the progress of the feature and ensures that tasks are appropriately broken down for efficient execution.
Add your answer
Loading...

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *