What are the implications of not calling super() in a derived class constructor?
- It has no implications
- It results in a syntax error
- It prevents the derived class from inheriting properties and methods
- It leads to a runtime error
Omitting 'super()' in a derived class constructor prevents proper initialization of the object and may lead to unexpected behavior, as the parent class constructor is not invoked. This can cause issues in inheriting properties and setting up the object's state correctly.
Loading...
Related Quiz
- What is the main difference between default exports and named exports in ES6 modules?
- Can JavaScript handle asynchronous tasks natively, and if so, how is this achieved in relation to the event loop?
- Can getter and setter functions be defined within ES6 object literals?
- In the context of Promises and AJAX, how does async/await improve error handling compared to .then() and .catch()?
- How does the super keyword differ when used in static methods compared to non-static methods?