In a project where tree shaking is vital for performance, how do you decide between using named and default exports?
- Using named exports for small utility functions and default exports for larger, more central functionalities
- Using default exports for small utility functions and named exports for larger, more central functionalities
- Exclusively using named exports to facilitate tree shaking
- Exclusively using default exports to facilitate tree shaking
When tree shaking is crucial for performance, using named exports for smaller utility functions allows for more granular control over what gets included in the bundle. For larger, more central functionalities, default exports can be beneficial. This approach ensures that only necessary code is bundled, improving the efficiency of tree shaking in eliminating unused code.
Loading...
Related Quiz
- In JavaScript, what happens when the call stack is full, commonly known as 'Stack Overflow'?
- In a web application with heavy DOM manipulations and API calls, how would the event loop and call stack manage these operations?
- In an application dealing with an array of user objects, which higher-order function would be best for filtering users based on specific criteria?
- ES6 mixins can be seen as an alternative to traditional ___________ in object-oriented programming.
- In ES6, can a class extend more than one class at a time?