You've encountered a "Callback Hell" in a project you've inherited. What could be a strategic approach to refactor and manage the nested callbacks for better readability and maintainability?
- Refactor using named functions
- Continue using nested callbacks
- Use anonymous arrow functions
- Convert callbacks to Promises
When dealing with "Callback Hell," the strategic approach is to refactor the code using named functions. This technique makes the code more readable and maintainable by breaking down nested callbacks into separate named functions. It enhances code structure and comprehensibility, making it easier to manage complex asynchronous logic.
Loading...
Related Quiz
- A _______ function is a function that accepts up to three arguments: the value of the element, the index of the element, and the array object being traversed.
- The ______ statement is used to specify a block of code to be executed if the condition is false.
- What does a Promise represent in JavaScript?
- You've encountered a do-while loop in a codebase which seems to execute one unnecessary iteration. What might be a possible reason for using do-while in this instance, and what could be an alternative solution?
- Which of the following is NOT a primitive data type in JavaScript?