Which type of testing is more efficient for repetitive test cases in ETL, automated or manual?
- Automated
- Dynamic
- Manual
- Semi-Automated
Manual testing is more efficient for repetitive test cases in ETL. It allows testers to apply human intelligence to identify patterns and variations that may not be easily captured in automated scripts.
Loading...
Related Quiz
- In a scenario where an organization must comply with GDPR, how do data quality tools assist in maintaining compliance?
- What is the primary goal of data extraction in the ETL process?
- A company faces challenges with data accuracy and reliability. How should data quality tools be implemented to address these issues?
- During the test requirement analysis of a large-scale ETL project involving big data technologies, what unique considerations should be taken into account?
- After a major ETL update, several unexpected defects arise. What steps should be taken to ensure these are reported and addressed effectively?