Your team is transitioning from a monolithic architecture to microservices, and each service has its own database schema. How would you coordinate database migrations across multiple services to maintain data consistency and minimize downtime?
- Adopt a shared-nothing architecture to isolate database instances for each microservice
- Assign each microservice team the responsibility of managing its database migrations
- Implement a centralized database migration service that coordinates schema changes across all microservices
- Use distributed transactions to synchronize schema changes across microservices
Assigning each microservice team the responsibility of managing its database migrations ensures that changes are aligned with the service's requirements and reduces coordination overhead. Implementing a centralized database migration service might introduce a single point of failure and increase complexity. Distributed transactions can lead to performance issues and tightly couple microservices. Adopting a shared-nothing architecture might provide isolation but doesn't inherently address coordination of schema changes and can increase operational complexity.
Loading...
Related Quiz
- Suppose you're designing a system where multiple goroutines need to communicate with each other asynchronously. Which concurrency construct in Go would you use and why?
- Explain a scenario where using anonymous structs could be beneficial.
- What happens if you try to access a key that doesn't exist in a map?
- In a distributed microservices architecture, how would you manage database connection pooling across multiple services to ensure optimal resource utilization and performance?
- The ________ package in Go provides functions for encoding and decoding JSON.