You're refactoring a large codebase in Go and come across a section where a small function is only used once and its behavior is tightly coupled with its context. Would you suggest converting this function into an anonymous function? Why or why not?
- No, because converting the function into an anonymous function would obscure its purpose and make it harder to understand the code without proper documentation.
- No, because refactoring the function into an anonymous function could hinder code readability and make it difficult to trace the function's origin and purpose.
- Yes, because converting the function into an anonymous function can improve code locality and reduce clutter in the surrounding code by keeping the behavior close to its usage.
- Yes, because using an anonymous function allows for better encapsulation of behavior and reduces namespace pollution, leading to cleaner code organization.
Converting a small, tightly coupled function into an anonymous function can improve code locality and reduce clutter, especially when the function is only used once and closely related to its context. However, it's essential to weigh the benefits against potential drawbacks such as reduced code readability and maintainability.
Loading...
Related Quiz
- The '_______' function in Go is used to regain control of a panicking goroutine.
- How do you synchronize Goroutines in Go?
- In Go unit testing, what does the 'go test -v' command do?
- When declaring multiple variables in a single statement in Go, you can use _______ to assign values to some or all of them.
- Describe a scenario where table-driven tests would be beneficial in Go.