In a Go project, you need to create a set of HTTP handlers, each performing a specific task. Would you use anonymous functions to define these handlers? Explain your reasoning.
- No, because using anonymous functions for HTTP handlers can lead to less maintainable code, as it becomes harder to reuse handlers across different routes and refactor them when needed.
- No, because using anonymous functions for HTTP handlers can make it challenging to unit test the handlers independently and may result in less organized code structure.
- Yes, because anonymous functions provide a concise way to define handlers inline and capture the necessary context, making the code more modular and easier to manage.
- Yes, because using anonymous functions for HTTP handlers allows for inline definition of handlers, reducing boilerplate code and improving code readability by keeping related logic together.
Using anonymous functions for defining HTTP handlers in a Go project offers benefits such as reduced boilerplate code and improved readability by keeping related logic together. However, it's essential to consider trade-offs such as code maintainability and testability when deciding whether to use anonymous functions for handlers.
Loading...
Related Quiz
- Describe a scenario where it would be beneficial to split a Go program into multiple packages.
- In Go, can anonymous functions be passed as arguments to other functions?
- What operator is used in Go to perform addition?
- What is the purpose of the 'defer' keyword in Go?
- When defining a method in Go, which convention is followed for the receiver parameter?