Fiona read about both inline functions and macros. In what situations might an inline function be a better choice over a macro?
- When code size needs to be minimized, when conditional compilation is required, when multiple statement blocks are needed, when performance is the primary concern
- When memory efficiency is crucial, when cross-platform compatibility is a priority, when macros introduce code duplication, when dynamic polymorphism is needed
- When type safety is essential, when function parameters require validation, when complex operations are involved, when debugging is necessary
- When variable scoping is critical, when the preprocessor directives are needed, when compile-time errors are acceptable, when portability is not a concern
Inline functions are often a better choice over macros in situations where type safety, parameter validation, complex operations, and debugging are essential. Unlike macros, inline functions provide type checking and encapsulation, making them more reliable and maintainable. Macros are generally used for conditional compilation and code size reduction but lack the type safety and debugging capabilities of inline functions.
Loading...
Related Quiz
- In C++11 and later, the keyword _______ can be used in a range-based for loop to avoid copying elements.
- The _______ of a recursive function is a condition that does not use recursion to produce an answer.
- In the context of function overloading, what are the possible ambiguities that might arise and how to avoid them?
- How does the virtual base class resolve the diamond problem in C++?
- Which data type would be most appropriate for storing a boolean value?