In Tailwind CSS, how does the approach of "utility-first" differ from traditional CSS frameworks like Bootstrap?

  • Utilizes a large set of single-purpose utility classes that directly apply styles in the HTML, promoting flexibility and customization.
  • Uses predefined components and a fixed set of class names for styling, limiting customization.
  • Tailwind and Bootstrap follow the same "utility-first" approach.
  • Tailwind only supports utility classes for typography, not for layout and spacing.
Tailwind CSS embraces a "utility-first" approach, offering a vast set of single-purpose utility classes that can be applied directly in the HTML. This approach provides flexibility and allows developers to customize styles efficiently. In contrast, traditional frameworks like Bootstrap rely on predefined components with fixed class names, which can limit customization options.
Add your answer
Loading...

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *