Compare and contrast the "ID," "XPath," and "Name" locator strategies in terms of performance and reliability.

  • ID: Fast and reliable, XPath: Slower but versatile, Name: Similar to ID
  • ID: Slow and unreliable, XPath: Fastest, Name: Similar to XPath
  • ID: Unique and fast, XPath: Unreliable, Name: Similar to XPath
  • ID: Versatile, XPath: Slow, Name: Unique and fast
The "ID" locator is often the fastest and most reliable, while "XPath" is versatile but can be slower. "Name" locators are similar to XPath but may have different levels of reliability depending on the application. The choice depends on the specific requirements of the test scenario.
Add your answer
Loading...

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *