How does WebFlux differ from the traditional Spring MVC framework in handling HTTP requests?
- Spring MVC uses a reactive programming model.
- Spring MVC uses a servlet-based architecture.
- WebFlux is asynchronous and non-blocking.
- WebFlux is single-threaded and blocking.
WebFlux differs from traditional Spring MVC by being asynchronous and non-blocking. In WebFlux, it handles requests reactively, meaning it can efficiently manage a large number of concurrent connections without blocking threads. On the other hand, traditional Spring MVC relies on a servlet-based architecture, which is typically blocking, making it less suitable for high-concurrency scenarios.
Loading...
Related Quiz
- What is the significance of the “spring.factories” file in creating custom Auto Configuration?
- How can you enable transaction management in a Spring Boot application?
- How can you customize the security configurations when performing integration testing with @SpringBootTest in Spring Boot?
- In a Spring Boot application, you are required to develop a feature where the response body should be customized based on the client's preference. How would you implement this feature using Spring Boot annotations?
- To simulate HTTP requests and responses in integration tests, Spring Boot provides the _____ class, allowing for testing of controller methods without starting the server.