How does Configuration Auditing differ from Configuration Control?
- Auditing checks for consistency, Control implements changes
- Auditing deals with financial records
- Auditing is a pre-development activity, Control is post-development
- Auditing is about user access management
Configuration Auditing and Configuration Control are both crucial aspects of Configuration Management. Configuration Auditing ensures that the current configuration of an item matches the specified requirements and checks for consistency and completeness, ensuring no unauthorized changes have occurred. On the other hand, Configuration Control involves evaluating, coordinating, approving or disapproving, and implementing changes to configured items.
Loading...
Related Quiz
- Considering the advanced features and integrations, which tool would be best suited for continuous integration and testing in a DevOps environment?
- What does a security audit primarily aim to evaluate?
- Which type of testing focuses on the interfaces between units and components?
- What is the main objective of a "walkthrough" in the review process?
- Which type of testing would best evaluate the emotional response of a user when interacting with a specific feature in an application?