How do "big bang" methods differ from a typical non-incremental integration testing approach?
- "Big bang" involves incremental testing of modules
- "Big bang" is focused on system testing only
- "Big bang" is more planned and systematic
- "Big bang" waits for all modules to be developed before testing
The "big bang" approach differs from typical non-incremental methods in that, in the "big bang" approach, the integration testing is deferred until all individual modules are developed. This could lead to challenges in identifying defects because everything is tested at once.
Loading...
Related Quiz
- In a situation where both manual and automated testers are available, but the application interface is still evolving and not stable, which type of testing would you prioritize and why?
- In white-box testing, what does the term "coverage" typically refer to?
- Which metric is essential for understanding the efficiency of the testing process by calculating the ratio of the number of defects detected to the number tested?
- The black-box testing technique which is specifically based on system models, such as state-transition diagrams or flowgraphs, is called _______ testing.
- What is the primary purpose of automated testing?