How can you revert a pushed commit in Git without losing history?
- git reset
- git revert
- git rollback
- git backout
To revert a pushed commit without losing history, use git revert. This command creates a new commit that undoes the changes introduced by the previous commit, preserving the commit history and avoiding force pushes.
How can you identify the specific commits that introduced conflicting changes during a merge in Git?
- git blame
- git show
- git diff
- git log
When a merge conflict occurs, using git diff will help identify the conflicting changes introduced by specific commits. This command shows the differences between the working directory and the index or a tree, making it useful for inspecting changes.
In Git, a _______ merge is used to integrate changes from one branch into another without creating a merge commit.
- Fast-Forward
- Squash
- Recursive
- Cherry-pick
The correct option is Fast-Forward. A Fast-Forward merge in Git is used to integrate changes from one branch into another when there are no new changes on the target branch. It performs a simple "move forward" of the branch pointer, avoiding the creation of a merge commit.
In Git, a '_______ merge' is used to integrate changes from one branch into another, creating a new commit even if a fast-forward merge is possible.
- Fast-forward
- Recursive
- Squash
- Three-way
In Git, a 'Three-way merge' is used to integrate changes from one branch into another, creating a new commit even if a fast-forward merge is possible. This merge strategy involves comparing the changes in three branches—the two branch tips and their common ancestor. It is particularly useful when there are conflicting changes on both branches.
Which Git command is used to undo the last commit while keeping the changes in the working directory?
- git reset HEAD~1
- git revert HEAD
- git commit --amend
- git checkout -- .
The correct option is git reset HEAD~1. This command resets the last commit while keeping the changes in the working directory. The HEAD~1 refers to the commit before the last one.
In a distributed team, a developer needs to integrate a hotfix into multiple branches efficiently. What Git approach or feature should they use?
- Git cherry-pick
- Git merge --squash
- Git rebase --onto
- Git submodules
The Git approach that allows a developer to integrate a hotfix into multiple branches efficiently is Git cherry-pick. Cherry-pick enables the selection of specific commits and applies them to another branch, making it suitable for applying hotfixes to multiple branches without merging the entire branch.
The strategy of _______ involves integrating changes from the main branch frequently to minimize conflicts.
- Rebase
- Clone
- Fork
- Pull Request
The correct option is Rebase. Rebase is a strategy in Git that involves integrating changes from one branch into another by moving or combining a sequence of commits. It helps maintain a cleaner commit history and minimizes conflicts during integration.
Using SSH ________ is a recommended method for secure authentication in Git.
- keys
- handshake
- certificates
- protocols
In Git, using SSH keys is a recommended method for secure authentication. SSH keys involve the use of asymmetric cryptography to secure the communication between the local and remote repositories.
How does Git integration in an IDE enhance the coding process?
- Streamlines collaboration with teammates
- Enables syntax highlighting and code completion
- Integrates with version control for tracking changes
- Provides AI-based code suggestions
Git integration in IDEs primarily focuses on version control, allowing developers to track changes. It doesn't directly impact syntax highlighting or code suggestions, which are IDE-specific features.
What strategies can be employed in Git to manage a large number of contributors in an open source project?
- Implementing access controls and code reviews
- Utilizing branches effectively
- Utilizing Git submodules
- Implementing a monolithic repository approach
In a large open source project, effective branch management and code review processes are essential to ensure a smooth collaboration among contributors. Utilizing branches effectively allows parallel development and collaboration without conflicts, making it a crucial strategy.