The technique where expert evaluators review an interface based on usability principles is termed _______.
- Cognitive Walkthrough
- Dynamic Analysis
- Heuristic Evaluation
- Interface Mapping
"Heuristic Evaluation" is a usability inspection method where expert evaluators individually review an interface based on a list of recognized usability principles, known as heuristics. These evaluators identify usability problems in the design, allowing designers to rectify these issues for an improved user experience.
When testers explore the application without any specific plans and simultaneously design and execute tests, they are engaged in _____.
- Exploratory Testing
- Regression Testing
- Scripted Testing
- Smoke Testing
Exploratory Testing involves testers exploring the software without pre-defined test cases or a specific plan. It's a dynamic process where testers learn the application and simultaneously design and execute tests to find defects.
_______ testing is beneficial when there are frequent code changes, and immediate feedback on the changes is needed.
- Dynamic Testing
- Regression Testing
- Smoke Testing
- Unit Testing
Regression Testing is the process of testing changes to applications to make sure that the older programming still works with the new changes. It's crucial when there are frequent code changes to ensure that new code doesn't negatively impact existing functionality.
You're a software engineer tasked with ensuring a function behaves correctly for a vast range of input numbers. Which test design technique would be most effective?
- Decision Table Testing
- Equivalence Partitioning
- State Transition Testing
- Usability Testing
Equivalence Partitioning is a test design technique where input data is divided into different equivalence classes based on their behavior. Testing only one value from each class is deemed sufficient. For a vast range of input numbers, it reduces the number of tests while ensuring effective coverage.
_______ testing is a subtype of performance testing where specific functions or modules are rigorously evaluated for performance.
- Component
- Smoke
- Soak
- System
Component Testing: Also known as module or unit testing, this focuses on testing specific functions or modules of an application independently to ensure their performance. It aims to identify any issues at the component level before integrating them into the larger system.
The phase in the bug life cycle where the defect is retested to ensure its rectification is termed _______.
- Resolution
- Retesting
- Validation
- Verification
The "Retesting" phase in the bug life cycle is when a specific defect or bug has been fixed and is tested to ensure its rectification. It's a verification process to confirm that the particular defect has been successfully addressed.
You are assigned a project where components are being developed concurrently by multiple teams. What form of integration testing can ensure that as each piece is completed, it works correctly with the others?
- Acceptance Testing
- Big Bang Integration
- Incremental Integration
- System Testing
Incremental Integration testing involves testing parts of a system sequentially as they're developed. In environments where multiple teams work on different components, this approach ensures that each new piece integrates smoothly with the existing parts, helping detect issues early and reducing integration risks.
The goal of _______ testing is to ensure that the software application performs adequately when subjected to varying workloads.
- Load Testing
- Performance Testing
- Scalability Testing
- Volume Testing
Performance Testing encompasses a range of tests (including Load, Stress, Scalability, and Volume Testing) to ensure that the software behaves well under expected loads, extreme conditions, and varying workloads. The objective is to deliver a seamless user experience, irrespective of the conditions or demands placed on the software.
How is the "Defect Removal Efficiency" metric typically calculated?
- (Defects fixed / Defects reported) x 100%.
- (Defects found by testers / Defects found by users) x 100%.
- (Defects found post-release / Total defects) x 100%.
- (Defects found pre-release / Total defects) x 100%.
"Defect Removal Efficiency" (DRE) metric measures the effectiveness of the testing process. It's calculated as the ratio of defects found before release (by the testing team) to the total defects (found both before and after release). A higher DRE indicates a more effective testing process.
You are assessing the efficiency of your test processes. Which metric would give you insights into how many defects remain in the software post-release?
- Code Coverage
- Post-release Defect Density
- Test Execution Time
- Test Pass Percentage
The "Post-release Defect Density" metric gives insights into the number of defects found in the software after its release. A high density suggests that the testing process might have missed issues, while a low density implies effective testing during the development phase.