Automated testing involves the initial cost of writing and maintaining scripts, making it not cost-effective for one-time testing scenarios. While automation can handle large-scale projects and performance testing, it's not recommended when the requirements change often.

Test levels, which include stages like unit, integration, system, and acceptance testing, play a critical role in the Test Planning phase. They help in organizing the sequence and scope of testing activities, ensuring that all components of the software are thoroughly evaluated at the appropriate stages.

Exploratory test cases are based on real-time learning and testers' expertise. Automation is not suitable because these tests are often non-repetitive, less predictable, and leverage the human ability to spot unexpected issues in an ad-hoc manner.

Automated testing significantly reduces the chances of human errors that can be introduced during manual testing. While it doesn't guarantee defect-free software, it provides a consistent and repeatable set of tests, ensuring that previously tested functionality remains intact.

Heuristic evaluation and standard user interface testing differ mainly in their method of analysis. A heuristic evaluation is a usability inspection method where evaluators, usually usability experts, compare a software product against a set of usability principles or heuristics. In contrast, standard UI testing is often scenario-based.

The primary purpose of developing test scripts in automation testing is to enable the execution of tests repeatedly without manual intervention. This ensures consistent test execution, efficient regression testing, and helps in validating application functionality across different test cycles.

Regression testing ensures that previously developed and tested software still works after a change. Given the repeated nature of regression testing, Automated Regression Testing is a suitable approach as it can efficiently handle repetitive test cases.

Regularly updating and maintaining an automated test suite is crucial to ensure that the suite is always in sync with the current version of the application. As software evolves, test cases that were once relevant might become obsolete, and new test scenarios may arise. Maintenance ensures the suite remains effective and reflective of current needs.

Cyclomatic Complexity is a white-box testing metric used to determine the complexity of a program. It calculates the number of linearly independent paths through a program's source code. A higher complexity score can indicate areas of the code that might be riskier or overlooked during testing, thus requiring more thorough testing.

Residual risk is the risk that remains after all risk response, mitigation, or prevention activities have been implemented. It represents the remaining threat even after you've taken measures to reduce the severity or likelihood of the adverse event.